Here is the structured PICO analysis for the twenty-seventh article you uploaded:


✅ 

Full Title (verbatim and exact):

“A rapid response and treatment service for care homes: a case study”

Waldon M

British Journal of Community Nursing (2021); 26(1):6–12


📄 

Type of Article:

Descriptive case study report with service evaluation elements


🔍 

PICO Analysis:

Population:

  • Older adults living in residential and nursing care homes (n = ~2400 across 51 homes) in Berkshire West, UK
  • Residents were typically frail, with multiple comorbidities, including those at risk of:
    • Delirium, COPD exacerbation, falls, UTIs, dehydration, or suspected sepsis 

Intervention:

  • The Rapid Response and Treatment (RRaT) service, an integrated, nurse-led hospital avoidance model providing urgent assessment and treatment for care home residents at risk of deterioration
  • Key features:
    • Operates 365 days/year, 9am–7pm
    • Responds within 2 hours to referrals
    • Advanced nurse practitioner-led, with access to GPs, geriatricians, physiotherapists, pharmacists, and OTs
    • Uses Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
    • Provides IV/SC fluids, IV antibiotics, nebulisers, blood tests, and case reviews at the care home
    • Works closely with out-of-hours services and the ambulance service 

Comparator:

  • Standard emergency referral pathways without RRaT involvement (i.e., care home → ED via 999 call or GP out-of-hours)
  • The article implicitly compares the RRaT approach to hospital admissions avoided in similar cases

Outcome:

1. Person-centred outcomes:

  • Illustrated in a detailed case study (“Sid’s story”):
    • Sid avoided hospital admission for suspected sepsis and COPD exacerbation
    • Received IV antibiotics, fluids, and regular review in the care home
    • Expressed wish to remain at home, respected through ACP and updated ReSPECT form
    • Family satisfaction was high, with involvement in decision-making
    • Outcome: Full recovery with improved comfort and dignity, aligned with patient’s goals 

2. Process outcomes:

  • Hospital admissions avoided due to early response and intensive in-home care
  • Care continuity maintained through MDT review and OOH handover (e.g., Adastra database)
  • Timely escalation with proactive support for:
    • Advanced care planning (ACP)
    • End-of-life planning
    • Medication optimisation
  • The article notes a tripling of referrals during COVID-19, largely managed within care homes 

3. Health system outcomes:

  • Reduces burden on acute hospitals
  • Supports early discharge and prevents emergency readmissions
  • Aligns with NHS England’s Ageing Well programme and Enhanced Health in Care Homes (EHCH) framework
  • Provides a scalable model for other regions or domiciliary (home) settings
  • Emphasises cultural shift needed to deliver acute care “in place” for frail older people 

Summary Conclusion:

This case study describes a highly effective Rapid Response and Treatment (RRaT) service for older people in Berkshire West care homes, illustrating how acute-level care—including sepsis treatment—can be delivered within the residential setting. The model supports hospital avoidance, person-centred decision-making, and end-of-life care aligned with patient values. With the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating its uptake, the RRaT service serves as a model of community-based hospital-at-home principles. Expansion of this model under the NHS Ageing Well programme is likely to benefit older people wishing to remain in familiar surroundings during health crises.


Leave a comment

Trending