Here is the standardised PICO analysis for the sixteenth uploaded article:


Full Title

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Advance Care Planning Interventions in Nursing Homes

Authors: Collin E. Burks, Omid Salaami, Sarah E. Cantrell, Neema K. Sharda, Mamata Yanamadala

JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association (JAMDA), 2023; 24(10):1809–1819

DOI10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.018

Type of Study

Systematic review of 23 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes


PICO Summary

Population (P)

  • Residents of nursing homes (including both long-stay and short-stay populations)
  • Studies from USA, Europe, Australia, Canada, and China
  • Some studies included residents with advanced illness or cognitive impairment, including dementia

Intervention (I)

  • Advance Care Planning (ACP) interventions, including:
    • Resident and family education (e.g. video decision aids)
    • Staff education and training programs
    • Structured discussions (e.g. facilitated family meetings)
    • Communication with primary medical teams
    • Utilisation of specialist palliative care input
  • Delivered via single or multi-component strategies at resident, staff, or facility levels

Comparison (C)

  • Standard care or alternative non-ACP interventions
  • Comparator arms varied across trials (usual care, education only, or non-specialist discussions)

Outcomes (O)

Outcomes were classified using the ACP Outcomes Framework into 5 domains:


1. Process Outcomes

  • Knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes:
    • Slightly more than half showed positive changes (e.g. increased staff knowledge, improved attitudes towards shared decision-making)

2. Action Outcomes

  • Documentation and decision-making behaviours:
    • Majority of studies showed increased ACP documentation, DNR/MOST/MOLST orders, and goal discussions
    • Evidence for changes in actual care preferences was mixed

3. Quality of Care Outcomes

  • Mixed findings overall:
    • Reduced decisional conflict in 3 studies 
    • Improved communication quality (staff and family reports) in 3 studies
    • Improved satisfaction with care and perceived care concordance in a few studies

4. Health Status Outcomes

  • No significant differences found in:
    • Mortality
    • Quality of life
    • Caregiver burden or distress

5. Health Care Utilisation Outcomes

  • Mixed but promising findings:
    • 4 of 13 studies showed reduced hospitalisations or emergency transfers
    • 2 of 3 studies showed reduced hospital-related costs (e.g. Molloy et al: 33% lower per-resident hospital costs)
    • Hospice uptake increased in only 1 of 5 studies

Findings Summary

  • ACP interventions in nursing homes can lead to meaningful changes in documentation, decision-making, communication, and reducing decisional conflict
  • Less consistent impact on hospital use, quality of life, or mortality
  • Multi-component interventions, especially those including staff education, were more likely to yield positive outcomes
  • Many studies were underpowered or limited by implementation fidelity, and varied in structure and outcome focus 

Leave a comment

Trending