Here is the standardised PICO analysis for the twentieth uploaded article:


Full Title

Acute Health Care Provision in Rural Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review of Integrated Care Models

Authors: Yasemin Özkaytan, Frank Schulz-Nieswandt, Susanne Zank

JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association (JAMDA), 2023; 24:1447–1457

DOI10.1016/j.jamda.2023.06.013

Type of Study

Scoping Review


PICO Summary

Population (P)

  • Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in rural areas, globally
  • Populations described were often frail, multimorbid older adults at high risk of hospitalisation and emergency department transfers
  • Also includes staff (nurses, general practitioners, case managers) involved in delivering or coordinating acute care in LTCFs

Intervention (I)

  • Integrated acute health care models designed to reduce emergency transfers and improve continuity of care within rural LTCFs
  • Five major intervention themes were synthesised from 35 projects across Germany, Australia, the United States, and other countries:
    1. Availability of specialists (e.g. nurse practitioners, in-house or visiting physicians)
    2. Organisational and quality management (e.g. standardised care coordination frameworks)
    3. Interdisciplinary networks (e.g. regular team meetings, medication advisory committees)
    4. Telemedicine (e.g. video consultations, electronic long-term care assessments)
    5. Telehealth (e.g. electronic records, cross-sector digital communication systems)

Comparison (C)

  • No formal comparator group (typical for scoping reviews), but studies often contrasted these integrated models with usual care or hospital-based models in narrative or descriptive terms

Outcomes (O)

System-level outcomes:

  • Reduced unnecessary hospitalisations and emergency department transfers
  • Improved access to specialist care and timeliness of decision-making
  • Better coordination of care and communication across settings

Process outcomes:

  • Enhanced use of advance care planning and palliative care pathways
  • Increased staff confidence, continuity, and proactive management
  • Digital platforms facilitated real-time consultation, health monitoring, and record-sharing

Person-centred outcomes (inferred, not directly measured):

  • Improved resident comfortreduced emotional distress, and more care aligned with residents’ goals

Findings Summary

This review synthesised a wide range of innovative integrated care models for rural LTCFs, identifying five key approaches that may reduce fragmentation and improve acute care delivery. While diverse in design and maturity, the models collectively promote coordination, communication, collaboration, and continuity as core principles of integrated rural aged care. The authors highlight the promise of telehealth and interdisciplinary networks but note the need for policy supportresource allocation, and research on implementation effectiveness in different contexts .


Leave a comment

Trending