Here is the structured PICO analysis for the fourth article you uploaded:


✅ 

Full Title (verbatim and exact):

“Appropriateness of Patient Transfer from Nursing Home to an Acute-Care Hospital: A Study of Emergency Room Visits and Hospital Admissions”

Howard Bergman, MD, and A. Mark Clarfield, MD

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991; 39:1164–1168

DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb03568.x


📄 

Type of Article:

Retrospective cohort study (record review over 3 years)


🔍 

PICO Analysis:

Population:

  • 112 residents of an 80-bed public nursing home in Quebec, Canada
  • Study period: 3 years (1981–1983)
  • Mean age: 81.6 years (range: 65–100)
  • Residents generally frail, long-stay, with varied care needs (over 60% required >2.5 hours of nursing care/day) 

Intervention:

  • Transfer to an acute care hospital (via Emergency Room or direct admission) for acute medical issues
  • Types of care required included diagnostics, IV medications, advanced imaging, or acute treatment unavailable at the nursing home
  • Transfers were examined for appropriateness based on outcome (admission, emergency procedures, or death in ED) 

Comparator:

  • Implicit comparator: Cases where the acute condition might have been managed within the nursing home
  • Defined as “inappropriate transfers”—transfers that did not require services beyond what could be delivered in the NH (e.g. behavioural issues, minor trauma, mild infection, etc.)

Outcome:

1. Person-centred outcomes:

  • Not explicitly examined in this study (no patient experience or quality of life metrics recorded)

2. Process outcomes:

  • 49% of residents were transferred at least once during the 3-year study
  • 102 total transfers:
    • 17% direct admissions
    • 34% ER → admission
    • 45% ER → return to NH
    • 4% died in the ED
  • Mean length of hospital stay: 18.8 days
  • Most common diagnoses: cardiovascular disease (31%), infection (19%), trauma (12%) 

3. Health system outcomes:

  • 93% of transfers considered appropriate (either admitted, required ER-exclusive procedures, or resulted in death)
  • 7% judged inappropriate: could have been managed in the NH with existing or modestly extended resources
  • Key conclusion: Most NH-to-hospital transfers were medically justified, but system strain, procedural limitations, and diagnostic gaps influenced transfer rates
  • Recommendations for future evaluation: better onsite capabilities, staffing, and reconsideration of transfer protocols, especially for terminally ill/demented residents 

Leave a comment

Trending