Here is the structured PICO analysis for the fourth article you uploaded:
✅
Full Title (verbatim and exact):
“Appropriateness of Patient Transfer from Nursing Home to an Acute-Care Hospital: A Study of Emergency Room Visits and Hospital Admissions”
Howard Bergman, MD, and A. Mark Clarfield, MD
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991; 39:1164–1168
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb03568.x
📄
Type of Article:
Retrospective cohort study (record review over 3 years)
🔍
PICO Analysis:
Population:
- 112 residents of an 80-bed public nursing home in Quebec, Canada
- Study period: 3 years (1981–1983)
- Mean age: 81.6 years (range: 65–100)
- Residents generally frail, long-stay, with varied care needs (over 60% required >2.5 hours of nursing care/day)
Intervention:
- Transfer to an acute care hospital (via Emergency Room or direct admission) for acute medical issues
- Types of care required included diagnostics, IV medications, advanced imaging, or acute treatment unavailable at the nursing home
- Transfers were examined for appropriateness based on outcome (admission, emergency procedures, or death in ED)
Comparator:
- Implicit comparator: Cases where the acute condition might have been managed within the nursing home
- Defined as “inappropriate transfers”—transfers that did not require services beyond what could be delivered in the NH (e.g. behavioural issues, minor trauma, mild infection, etc.)
Outcome:
1. Person-centred outcomes:
- Not explicitly examined in this study (no patient experience or quality of life metrics recorded)
2. Process outcomes:
- 49% of residents were transferred at least once during the 3-year study
- 102 total transfers:
- 17% direct admissions
- 34% ER → admission
- 45% ER → return to NH
- 4% died in the ED
- Mean length of hospital stay: 18.8 days
- Most common diagnoses: cardiovascular disease (31%), infection (19%), trauma (12%)
3. Health system outcomes:
- 93% of transfers considered appropriate (either admitted, required ER-exclusive procedures, or resulted in death)
- 7% judged inappropriate: could have been managed in the NH with existing or modestly extended resources
- Key conclusion: Most NH-to-hospital transfers were medically justified, but system strain, procedural limitations, and diagnostic gaps influenced transfer rates
- Recommendations for future evaluation: better onsite capabilities, staffing, and reconsideration of transfer protocols, especially for terminally ill/demented residents
Leave a comment