Here is the structured PICO analysis for the sixth article you uploaded:


✅ 

Full Title (verbatim and exact):

“Implementation and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) in acute care”

Paulik O, Whitaker R, Mesuria M, et al.

Australasian Journal on Ageing, 2024; 43:591–599

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13308


📄 

Type of Article:

Retrospective observational audit study


🔍 

PICO Analysis:

Population:

  • 153 patients admitted to an acute aged care precinct in a metropolitan tertiary referral hospital (Sydney, NSW)
  • Mean age: 84.1 years
  • 37% admitted from residential aged care
  • All had age-related or life-limiting conditions; 99% were SPICT™-positive, with high levels of frailty, dementia, or multi-morbidity 

Intervention:

  • Use of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) to:
    • Identify patients at risk of deterioration or death within 12 months
    • Trigger advance care planning (ACP) conversations and documentation
  • Tool involves assessment of:
    • ≥2 general indicators (e.g. dependency, weight loss)
    • ≥1 clinical indicator (e.g. dementia, cancer, organ failure)

Comparator:

  • No explicit control group
  • Internal comparison based on outcomes at 6 and 12 months post-SPICT™ assessment and adherence to ACP documentation

Outcome:

1. Person-centred outcomes:

  • Mortality rates:
    • 36% at 6 months
    • 39% at 12 months
  • Mean SPICT™ score significantly higher among those who died, indicating predictive value for early deterioration
  • Only 16% of SPICT-positive patients had ACP documented, and 30% had active resuscitation plans (e.g., ICU, CPR), raising concerns of futile intervention in a frail cohort 

2. Process outcomes:

  • Assessment showed 99% SPICT positivity, but poor adherence to ACP documentation in eMR
    • Only 15% had completed ACP tab
    • 64% had NFR documented, but often without linked ACP notes
  • Documentation quality improved only after systematic changes to the eMR (new ACP tab introduced post-study)

3. Health system outcomes:

  • Identified a missed opportunity for timely goals-of-care discussions and avoidance of potentially costly and non-beneficial interventions
  • Recommendations include early SPICT™ screening, enhanced training for clinicians, and systemic improvements to ACP workflows

Leave a comment

Trending