Here is the standardised PICO analysis for the third uploaded article:


Full Title

The integrated implementation of two end-of-life care tools in nursing care homes in the UK: an in-depth evaluation

Authors: J. Hockley, J. Watson, D. Oxenham, S. A. Murray

JournalPalliative Medicine, 2010; 24(8): 828–838

DOI10.1177/0269216310373162

Type of Study

Mixed-methods in-depth evaluation

Includes retrospective record reviewstaff survey, and implementation study with pre/post comparisons.


PICO Summary

Population (P)

  • Residents of seven private nursing care homes in Midlothian, Scotland
  • Total of 228 deceased residents (110 pre-implementation, 138 post-implementation)
  • Age range: 66–103 years, with over one-third aged ≥90
  • High frailty; 66% had dementia; most died within 2 years of admission
  • Also included staff across the nursing homes (for audit)

Intervention (I)

  • Integrated implementation of two end-of-life care tools:
    1. Gold Standards Framework for Care Homes (GSFCH)
    2. Adapted Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP)
  • Delivered via:
    • High-intensity facilitation (visits every 10–14 days)
    • Key staff (“champions”) trained and supported
    • Monthly case review meetings
    • Scenario-based education sessions for all staff
    • ACP and DNAR discussions promoted systematically

Comparison (C)

  • Pre-implementation period (12 months prior) served as the comparator
  • No external control group, but baseline data were robustly analysed

Outcomes (O)

Person-centred outcomes:

  • Increased staff confidence in talking about dying
  • More discussions and documentation of residents’ wishes
  • Shift in care culture from curative to comfort-focused care

Process outcomes:

  • DNAR documentation increased from 15% to 72%
  • Advance Care Planning (ACP) documentation rose from 4% to 53%
  • LCP use increased from 3% to 31%
  • Improved symptom documentation and family communication practices
  • Changes in staff attitudes: 88% reported shift from “striving to keep alive” to quality of life focus 

Health system outcomes:

  • Hospital deaths reduced from 15% to 8%
  • Clinically inappropriate hospital bed-days reduced from 82% to 44%
  • Decrease in overall hospital admissions in the last 8 weeks of life
  • 38% reduction in hospital bed-days for dying residents

Findings Summary

  • Implementation of GSFCH and LCP tools was associated with meaningful improvements in end-of-life care practices
  • Greatest success in homes with stable leadership; staff turnover remained a challenge
  • Sustained culture change required ongoing facilitation and involvement from senior management
  • The study supports policy recommendations to embed structured palliative care tools in nursing home settings 

Leave a comment

Trending