Here is the PICO analysis for the sixth uploaded article:
✅ PICO Analysis
Full Article Title:
Avoiding costly hospitalisation at end of life: findings from a specialist palliative care pilot in residential care for older adults
Type of Study:
Quasi-experimental design with matched historical controls
Journal and Year:
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (2018); 8:102–109
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001071
P – Population
- Setting: Four residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Canberra, Australia
- Participants:
- 104 residents in the intervention group (including those discussed in needs rounds, referred urgently to specialist palliative care (SPC), or who died during the study period)
- 173 matched historical controls (decedents from the 3 years prior to the intervention)
- Characteristics:
- Mean age: 89 years (intervention group) vs 86 years (control group)
- Common diagnoses: dementia, cardiac failure
- High comorbidity burden (Charlson score: 6.3 vs 5.0, p < 0.01)
I – Intervention
- Type:
- Specialist Palliative Care (SPC) Nurse Practitioner-led “Needs Rounds” model
- Description:
- Monthly structured, case-based multidisciplinary meetings at each RACF, led by an SPC Nurse Practitioner
- Focus on identifying residents with a prognosis of ≤6 months or high complexity needs
- Involved proactive planning, clinical mentoring, goals of care discussions, and advance care planning (ACP)
- Supplemented by direct SPC access, prescribing, and follow-up care coordination
- Education embedded into case-based discussions with facility staff
C – Comparison
- Control Group:
- Historical cohort of residents who died prior to the intervention, receiving “usual care” SPC support via ad hoc GP referral
- No systematic needs rounds or proactive case identification
O – Outcomes
Primary Outcomes:
- Hospitalisation Outcomes:
- No significant change in hospital admission rates (average 0.8 vs 0.6, p = 0.11)
- Significant reduction in length of hospital stays:
- All decedents: 2.17-day reduction (p = 0.02)
- Needs Round subgroup: 3.22-day reduction (p < 0.01) = 67% reduction in admitted days
- Place of Death:
- 76% had documented Preferred Place of Death (PPoD)
- 100% of residents with PPoD died in their preferred location
- 96% of those nominated residential aged care as PPoD
- Hospital deaths reduced by 10% in the needs round subgroup (p = 0.04)
- Cost Savings (estimates):
- $A115,539 saved across 58 decedents (based on $A918 per hospital bed day)
- Approx. $A1,992 saved per decedent (increased to $A2,955 in needs round subgroup)
Outcome Classification:
- Person-centred outcomes: Goal-concordant care, avoidance of unwanted transfers, increased rates of in-place death
- Process outcomes: Better documentation of PPoD, structured ACP, improved staff knowledge
- System outcomes: Reduced hospital bed days and associated costs
Leave a comment