Here is the PICO analysis for the sixth uploaded article:


✅ PICO Analysis

Full Article Title:

Avoiding costly hospitalisation at end of life: findings from a specialist palliative care pilot in residential care for older adults

Type of Study:

Quasi-experimental design with matched historical controls

Journal and Year:

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (2018); 8:102–109

DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001071


P – Population

  • Setting: Four residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Canberra, Australia
  • Participants:
    • 104 residents in the intervention group (including those discussed in needs rounds, referred urgently to specialist palliative care (SPC), or who died during the study period)
    • 173 matched historical controls (decedents from the 3 years prior to the intervention)
  • Characteristics:
    • Mean age: 89 years (intervention group) vs 86 years (control group)
    • Common diagnoses: dementia, cardiac failure
    • High comorbidity burden (Charlson score: 6.3 vs 5.0, p < 0.01) 

I – Intervention

  • Type:
    • Specialist Palliative Care (SPC) Nurse Practitioner-led “Needs Rounds” model
  • Description:
    • Monthly structured, case-based multidisciplinary meetings at each RACF, led by an SPC Nurse Practitioner
    • Focus on identifying residents with a prognosis of ≤6 months or high complexity needs
    • Involved proactive planning, clinical mentoring, goals of care discussions, and advance care planning (ACP)
    • Supplemented by direct SPC access, prescribing, and follow-up care coordination
    • Education embedded into case-based discussions with facility staff

C – Comparison

  • Control Group:
    • Historical cohort of residents who died prior to the intervention, receiving “usual care” SPC support via ad hoc GP referral
    • No systematic needs rounds or proactive case identification

O – Outcomes

Primary Outcomes:

  1. Hospitalisation Outcomes:
    • No significant change in hospital admission rates (average 0.8 vs 0.6, p = 0.11)
    • Significant reduction in length of hospital stays:
      • All decedents: 2.17-day reduction (p = 0.02)
      • Needs Round subgroup: 3.22-day reduction (p < 0.01) = 67% reduction in admitted days 
  2. Place of Death:
    • 76% had documented Preferred Place of Death (PPoD)
    • 100% of residents with PPoD died in their preferred location
    • 96% of those nominated residential aged care as PPoD
    • Hospital deaths reduced by 10% in the needs round subgroup (p = 0.04)
  3. Cost Savings (estimates):
    • $A115,539 saved across 58 decedents (based on $A918 per hospital bed day)
    • Approx. $A1,992 saved per decedent (increased to $A2,955 in needs round subgroup)

Outcome Classification:

  • Person-centred outcomes: Goal-concordant care, avoidance of unwanted transfers, increased rates of in-place death
  • Process outcomes: Better documentation of PPoD, structured ACP, improved staff knowledge
  • System outcomes: Reduced hospital bed days and associated costs 

Leave a comment

Trending