Here is the standardised PICO analysis for the thirty-fourth uploaded article:
Full Title
Interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing homes: A mixed-methods systematic review
Authors: Silvia Gonella, Gary Mitchell, Laura Bavelaar, Alessio Conti, Mariangela Vanalli, Ines Basso, Nicola Cornally
Journal: Palliative Medicine, 2022; 36(2): 268–291
DOI: 10.1177/02692163211066733
Type of Study
Mixed-methods systematic review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) convergent integrated approach
PICO Summary
Population (P)
- Family caregivers (e.g. spouses, adult children, close relatives) of people with advanced dementia living in nursing homes
- End-of-life phase defined as the final weeks or months of life
- Participants across 11 studies included caregivers, healthcare professionals, and nursing home staff
Intervention (I)
- Caregiver-level interventions to provide information, emotional support, or education, including:
- Ongoing face-to-face discussions with healthcare providers
- Written informational booklets on comfort care in dementia
- Structured psychoeducational programs (e.g. 10-week group sessions)
- Family meetings with or without psychological or educational support
- Personalised support via email or in-person with trained dementia professionals
Comparison (C)
- No formal comparator; included studies had varied controls (e.g. comparison groups, usual care, or pre/post evaluation)
Outcomes (O)
Primary outcomes:
- Improved emotional preparedness, decision-making confidence, and caregiver empowerment
- Reduced caregiver stress and burden in multi-session psychoeducational programs
- Enhanced understanding of the disease, dying trajectory, and care preferences
Secondary outcomes:
- Written materials increased comprehension and supported verbal discussions
- Regular, tailored meetings more effective than one-off sessions
- Single structured meetings had no significant impact on depression or life satisfaction
Findings Summary
Three integrated findings were identified:
- Ongoing end-of-life discussions that provide emotional support, foster shared decision-making, and deepen caregiver-provider partnerships are vital.
- Face-to-face discussions, supported by written materials, should be tailored in timing and delivery to caregiver preferences and cultural context.
- Structured psychoeducational programs and regular meetings—ideally with professionals skilled in psychological support—can promote caregiver empowerment, resilience, and self-care. These are superior to one-time discussions or written information alone.
The authors recommend integrating peer interaction and hybrid models (e.g. combining face-to-face discussion with written or digital resources) into future intervention designs .
Leave a comment