Here is the standardised PICO analysis for the sixty-second uploaded article:


Full Title

Nursing Home Characteristics Associated with Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention

Authors: Lacey Loomer, Ellen McCreedy, Emmanuelle Belanger, et al.

JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2019; 20(7):804–809.e1

DOI10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.133


Type of Study

Cross-sectional analysis of nursing home-level variation in adherence to an advance care planning (ACP) video intervention as part of the PROVEN pragmatic trial


PICO Summary

Population (P)

  • 119 U.S. nursing homes enrolled in the PROVEN trial (intervention arm)
  • Resident subgroups: short-stay (<100 days) and long-stay (≥100 days)
  • Most facilities were part of two large for-profit chains; majority of Champions were social workers 

Intervention (I)

  • ACP Video Education Program:
    • 5 short (~6–10 min) videos offered via tablet or online
    • Champions (typically social workers) tasked with offering the videos to:
      • Short-stay residents within 14 days of admission
      • Long-stay residents every 6 months
    • Structured video status reports (VSRs) tracked whether a video was offered or shown
  • Monthly check-in calls supported champions with implementation feedback and guidance 

Comparison (C)

  • Compared implementation fidelity (offer and show rates) between nursing homes with different:
    • Star ratings
    • Staff turnover
    • Champion engagement (e.g. check-in call attendance)
    • Resident composition (age, cognition)
    • Staffing and quality indicators

Outcomes (O)

Primary outcomes (measured via EMR-integrated VSRs):

  • Offer rate (% of eligible residents offered a video)
  • Show rate (% of eligible residents who viewed a video)

Results:

  • Median offer rates:
    • Short-stay: 80% (range 0–100%)
    • Long-stay: 58%
  • Median show rates:
    • Short-stay: 10%
    • Long-stay: 13%
    • Ranges for both from 0% to ~80% 

Regression analysis findings:

  • Higher CMS star rating (2–5 stars) significantly associated with higher offer rates for both resident groups (p < 0.01)
  • Check-in call attendance positively associated with higher offer and show rates in long-stay residents
  • Champion turnover, staffing levels, bed size, cognitive status, and payer mix not consistently associated with offer/show rates

Findings Summary

This study highlights substantial variation in implementation of the same intervention across nursing homes. Key insights include:

  • Better-quality facilities (higher star ratings) had greater success integrating the video program into routine care
  • Champion engagement via check-in calls played a crucial role in maintaining implementation fidelity
  • Lower-rated facilities may lack the capacity, leadership, or organisational support to sustain even low-burden interventions without targeted support
  • Findings emphasise the need for tailored implementation strategies for under-resourced homes in future trials

Conclusion

Even simple ACP interventions like video education require ongoing supportlocal leadership buy-in, and context-aware facilitation to be implemented consistently. Without this, there is risk of exacerbating care disparities between higher- and lower-performing nursing homes in pragmatic research and practice improvement initiatives .


Leave a comment

Trending