Here is the standardised PICO analysis for the forty-fourth uploaded article:


Full Title

Strengthening advance care planning in rural residential aged care through multidisciplinary educational case conferences: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study

Authors: Suzanne Rainsford, Sally Hall Dykgraaf, Rosny Kasim, Christine Phillips, Nicholas Glasgow

JournalProgress in Palliative Care, 2021; 29(4):199–208

DOI10.1080/09699260.2021.1872136


Type of Study

Hybrid implementation-effectiveness study using a convergent mixed-methods design


PICO Summary

Population (P)

  • Residents of two rural residential aged care (RAC) facilities in Cooma, New South Wales, Australia
  • Total of 112 beds across facilities; 23 residents died during the study period
  • Targeted residents had no clear or up-to-date advance care plans (ACPs), especially following recent hospitalisations or acute medical events

Intervention (I)

  • Implementation of Multidisciplinary Educational Case Conferences (MuDECCs):
    • One-hour meetings including:
      • Resident (where possible)
      • Family or guardian
      • General Practitioner (GP)
      • Registered Nurse(s)
      • Care assistants
      • Community pharmacist
      • Palliative care nurses and others
    • Used to coordinate care, initiate ACP discussions, chart anticipatory medications, and provide interprofessional education
    • Supported by a logic model (see Figure 1 on page 5) and facilitated documentation of outcomes 

Comparison (C)

  • No formal control group; baseline comparison was drawn from decedent reviews and pre-existing ACP practices in the facilities

Outcomes (O)

Implementation Outcomes:

  • 10 MuDECCs conducted
  • 51 individuals participated (mean 9 per session)
  • Implementation was found to be acceptable and valuable, but time-consuming
  • Enablers: strong interpersonal networks in rural settings, committed leadership, active involvement of community pharmacist
  • Barriers: staff shortages, high GP workload, logistical constraints (e.g. one facility lacked after-hours RNs), reliance on voluntary effort 

Effectiveness Outcomes:

  • Of 23 residents who died:
    • 65% had a documented ACP
    • 57% had anticipatory medications charted
    • 39% died in hospital, despite none indicating hospital as preferred place of death
  • Following MuDECCs:
    • 6 new ACPs and 3 updates completed
    • Anticipatory meds charted in 3 cases
  • Surveys from families and staff showed high satisfaction and increased confidence, understanding, and clarity around roles and care goals 

Findings Summary

MuDECCs were shown to:

  • Facilitate timely and collaborative advance care planning
  • Promote shared decision-making and reduction of hospital transfers
  • Enhance staff and family confidence, understanding of care goals, and role clarity
  • Serve as an educational tool, especially for rural healthcare workers with limited access to palliative training

However, sustainability is challenged by:

  • Time burden on facilitators and participants
  • Under-remuneration of key professionals (e.g. pharmacists, GPs)
  • Difficulty integrating into routine workflows

Recommendations:

  • Consider funding or formal recognition for staff roles
  • Explore telehealth options and scalable models
  • Evaluate impact on hospital transfers and ACP quality in future research

Leave a comment

Trending