Here is the PICO analysis for the twenty-fourth uploaded article (abstract):


✅ PICO Analysis

Full Article Title:

Leadership Collaborative Education Intervention to Enhance the Quality of End-of-Life Care in Nursing Homes: The IMPRESS Project

Type of Study:

Quality improvement intervention with pre–post design using self-reported measures

Journal and Year:

Poster Abstract, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (JAMDA), 2010

Authors: Maung Tin, Gregory Gatchell, Yukako Tachibana, Jeannette Koijane, Kenneth Zeri, Christina Bell, Kamal Masaki, Aida Wen 


P – Population

  • Setting:
    • 5 community nursing homes in Honolulu, Hawaii
  • Participants:
    • Nursing home leadership and senior clinical staff (n = 18)
    • Including Directors of Nursing, charge nurses, social workers, and administrators 

I – Intervention

  • Program Name: IMPRESS (IMproving PRofessional Education and Sustaining Support)
  • Design:
    • 1-year leadership collaborative
    • Quarterly educational sessions on evidence-based strategies for end-of-life (EOL) care
    • Open discussion forums during each session to facilitate experience sharing and reflection
  • Topics Covered:
    • Advance directive discussions
    • Policy and form reviews
    • Communication with hospice and palliative care services
    • EOL identification and respectful death facilitation
    • Satisfaction survey integration
  • Measurement:
    • Pre- and post-session self-assessment on 8 EOL implementation practices (1–4 scale) 

C – Comparison

  • Comparator:
    • Baseline self-reported ratings of EOL care practices by each participant prior to education sessions
    • Post-intervention ratings used for within-subject pre–post comparisons

O – Outcomes

Quantitative Results (Statistically Significant Improvements):

  • Identification of limited life expectancy: +1.25 (p < 0.0001)
  • Advance directive discussions: +0.91 (p = 0.002)
  • Reviewing policies and forms: +1.08 and +0.75 (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.002)
  • Communication with physicians and nurses: +1.17 (p < 0.0001)
  • Facilitating respectful death: +1.0 (p < 0.0001)
  • Communication with hospice/palliative providers: +0.75 (p = 0.006)
  • Inclusion of EOL questions in family/patient satisfaction surveys: +0.5 (p = 0.05)

Barriers Reduced After Intervention:

  • Time constraints (initially cited by 50%)
  • Knowledge deficits (33%)
  • Competing priorities (25%) 

Outcome Classification

  • Person-centred outcomes: Indirect – aimed at enhancing respectful death, family communication, and satisfaction through system improvements
  • Process outcomes: Strong evidence of increased staff readiness and system implementation of EOL care strategies
  • Health system outcomes: Not directly measured, but likely positive implications for care quality, advance directive use, and reduced crisis transfers

Summary Conclusion

The IMPRESS project demonstrates that leadership-focused collaborative education significantly improves nursing home staff implementation of evidence-based end-of-life care practices. The intervention enhanced communication, policy review, and advance directive use across five facilities. Reported barriers—like lack of time and knowledge—were reduced post-intervention. While clinical outcomes were not measured, the program shows strong promise for system-wide culture change and quality improvement in EOL care delivery .


Leave a comment

Trending