Here is the PICO analysis for the article:

Full Article Title:

Improving Care for Nursing Home–Acquired Pneumonia in a Managed Care Environment

Authors: Hutt E, Reznickova N, Morgenstern N, Frederickson E, Kramer AM

Journal: American Journal of Managed Care (2004); 10(10):681–686

URL: Not provided; citation confirmed by source PDF 


✅ PICO Analysis

Type of Study:

Pre–post intervention pilot study (quasi-experimental), with chart review and implementation of a guideline-based care pathway


P – Population

  • Setting:Six nursing homes in Denver, Colorado where a nonprofit, group-model HMO contracts for Medicare Part A services
  • Participants:
    • 78 HMO-enrolled residents across six facilities with suspected or confirmed nursing home–acquired pneumonia (NHAP)
    • Subgroup of 25 residents from one facility participated in the pilot intervention
  • Eligibility Criteria:Residents with 2 or more symptoms (at least one respiratory), excluding those whose symptoms began <5 days after admission (to avoid capturing hospital-acquired infections)

I – Intervention

  • Multifaceted guideline-based intervention at one pilot site:
    1. Organizational Changes:
      • Facility-wide vaccination push (influenza + pneumococcal)
      • On-site antibiotic starter kits (“tackle boxes”) to reduce treatment delays
    2. Staff Education:
      • Quarterly interactive in-services for nursing and aide staff focused on:
        • Recognising respiratory symptoms
        • Prompt physician notification
        • Complete vital sign documentation
    3. Clinical Pathway Use:
      • Providers encouraged to follow a standardised care pathway (see diagram on page 2) addressing evaluation, antibiotic use, and decisions around hospitalisation or treatment-in-place

C – Comparison

  • Comparator:
    • Baseline care in the same pilot facility prior to intervention (retrospective chart review)
    • Comparison of adherence to 16 specific NHAP care guideline indicators pre- vs post-intervention

O – Outcomes

Person-Centred Outcomes:

  • Not directly reported; however, implications for improved survival and quality of care inferred from reductions in missed vaccinations and inappropriate antibiotic use

Process Outcomes:

  • Guideline adherence (see Table, page 5):
    • Influenza vaccination improved: 14% → 52% (p = .01)
    • Appropriate antibiotic prescribing increased: 47% → 85% (p = .03)
    • Overall guideline adherence score rose: 52% → 63% (p = .04)
    • No significant change in pneumococcal vaccination rates or staff-triggered actions (e.g., prompt vitals, timely physician notification)

Health System Outcomes:

  • Not measured explicitly (e.g., mortality or hospitalisation not reported as outcomes), but improvements in timely treatment and vaccination adherence suggest likely downstream benefits

Summary Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a multidisciplinary, multifaceted intervention targeting nursing home–acquired pneumonia can improve adherence to evidence-based guidelines, especially for physician-driven processes like vaccination and antibiotic choice. Improvements were modest but statistically significant. Processes requiring nursing initiative (e.g., timely notification, complete vital signs) were less impacted. The model appears feasible within an integrated care system and may be replicable in other managed care environments with similar infrastructure .


Leave a comment

Trending