Here is the PICO analysis for the article:
Full Article Title:
The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end-of-life care for older people
Authors: Jeong SY-S, Higgins I, McMillan M
Journal: Journal of Clinical Nursing (2010); 19:389–397
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x
✅ PICO Analysis
Type of Study:
Single-site case study using multiple qualitative data sources (participant observation, field notes, semi-structured interviews, document analysis)
P – Population
- Setting:Three residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in a regional health service area of New South Wales, Australia
- Participants:
- Older residents receiving high-level residential care
- Their family members
- Registered nurses (RNs)
- One Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) as program facilitator
- Context:
- Residents often had complex chronic illnesses and were approaching end of life
- ACP programme was part of a state-supported Chronic and Complex Care Program
I – Intervention
- Advance Care Planning (ACP) ProgrammeFacilitated by an experienced Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC), focused on increasing ACP and Advance Care Directive (ACD) uptake through a structured, multidisciplinary model
- Key Components (Based on a service model framework):
- Input:
- Organisational policy/manuals
- Department of Health guidelines
- Psychological and medical catalysts
- Leadership by an expert CNC
- Throughput:
- Case conferences
- Education sessions
- Use of standardised forms and assessment tools
- Communication with families, GPs, and health professionals
- Ethical/legal considerations and multidisciplinary team involvement
- Output:
- Completion of ACDs
- Improved autonomy and person-centred care
- Dying with dignity
- Cultural change in attitudes toward death and dying
- Feedback:
- Ongoing process evaluation and adjustment based on staff input
- Input:
C – Comparison
- No formal control or comparison groupThe study focused on capturing real-world implementation in depth through qualitative description and observation
O – Outcomes
Person-Centred Outcomes:
- Enhanced autonomy for residents in expressing care preferences
- Increased resident and family satisfaction through meaningful involvement in care planning
- Greater alignment of care with residents’ wishes
- Promotion of dignity and improved dying experiences
Process Outcomes:
- Clear documentation of Advance Care Directives and Plans of Treatment
- Increased RN and staff understanding of ACP
- Increased nurse-initiated discussions about end-of-life care
- Multidisciplinary team collaboration and GP involvement
- Use of critical incident and thematic analysis for continuous reflection and system learning
Health System Outcomes (inferred):
- Anticipated reduction in inappropriate hospital transfers and interventions
- Reduction in moral distress among nurses due to clear direction from ACDs
- Organisational shift toward more formalised, values-driven end-of-life care practices
Summary Conclusion:
This case study provided a comprehensive, systems-level look at the implementation of ACP in Australian RACFs. Successful outcomes were attributed to four essential factors: expert nursing leadership, structured discussions, staff education, and multidisciplinary involvement. The study’s findings support ACP as a person-centred, empowering process that contributes to improved clinical clarity and resident wellbeing, with ripple effects on family members and staff culture .
Leave a comment