Here is the PICO analysis for the article:

Full Article Title:

The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end-of-life care for older people

Authors: Jeong SY-S, Higgins I, McMillan M

Journal: Journal of Clinical Nursing (2010); 19:389–397

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x


✅ PICO Analysis

Type of Study:

Single-site case study using multiple qualitative data sources (participant observation, field notes, semi-structured interviews, document analysis)


P – Population

  • Setting:Three residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in a regional health service area of New South Wales, Australia
  • Participants:
    • Older residents receiving high-level residential care
    • Their family members
    • Registered nurses (RNs)
    • One Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) as program facilitator
  • Context:
    • Residents often had complex chronic illnesses and were approaching end of life
    • ACP programme was part of a state-supported Chronic and Complex Care Program

I – Intervention

  • Advance Care Planning (ACP) ProgrammeFacilitated by an experienced Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC), focused on increasing ACP and Advance Care Directive (ACD) uptake through a structured, multidisciplinary model
  • Key Components (Based on a service model framework):
    • Input:
      • Organisational policy/manuals
      • Department of Health guidelines
      • Psychological and medical catalysts
      • Leadership by an expert CNC
    • Throughput:
      • Case conferences
      • Education sessions
      • Use of standardised forms and assessment tools
      • Communication with families, GPs, and health professionals
      • Ethical/legal considerations and multidisciplinary team involvement
    • Output:
      • Completion of ACDs
      • Improved autonomy and person-centred care
      • Dying with dignity
      • Cultural change in attitudes toward death and dying
    • Feedback:
      • Ongoing process evaluation and adjustment based on staff input

C – Comparison

  • No formal control or comparison groupThe study focused on capturing real-world implementation in depth through qualitative description and observation

O – Outcomes

Person-Centred Outcomes:

  • Enhanced autonomy for residents in expressing care preferences
  • Increased resident and family satisfaction through meaningful involvement in care planning
  • Greater alignment of care with residents’ wishes
  • Promotion of dignity and improved dying experiences

Process Outcomes:

  • Clear documentation of Advance Care Directives and Plans of Treatment
  • Increased RN and staff understanding of ACP
  • Increased nurse-initiated discussions about end-of-life care
  • Multidisciplinary team collaboration and GP involvement
  • Use of critical incident and thematic analysis for continuous reflection and system learning

Health System Outcomes (inferred):

  • Anticipated reduction in inappropriate hospital transfers and interventions
  • Reduction in moral distress among nurses due to clear direction from ACDs
  • Organisational shift toward more formalised, values-driven end-of-life care practices

Summary Conclusion:

This case study provided a comprehensive, systems-level look at the implementation of ACP in Australian RACFs. Successful outcomes were attributed to four essential factors: expert nursing leadership, structured discussions, staff education, and multidisciplinary involvement. The study’s findings support ACP as a person-centred, empowering process that contributes to improved clinical clarity and resident wellbeing, with ripple effects on family members and staff culture .


Leave a comment

Trending